ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM: IMPORTANCE IN SURGICAL CLINIC (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Arq Bras Cir Dig
  • v.35; 2022
  • PMC9254532

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM: IMPORTANCE IN SURGICALCLINIC (1)

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian Archives of Digestive Surgery

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022; 35: e1666.

Published online 2022 Jun 24. doi:10.1590/0102-672020210002e1666

PMCID: PMC9254532

PMID: 35766611

Language: English | Portuguese

Edmundo Vieira PRADO, NETO1 and Andy PETROIANU2

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND:

Knowledge of the portal system and its anatomical variations aids to preventsurgical adverse events. The portal vein is usually made by the confluence ofthe superior mesenteric and splenic veins, together with their main tributaries,the inferior mesenteric, left gastric, and pancreaticoduodenal veins; however,anatomical variations are frequent.

AIM:

This article presents a literature review regarding previously describedanatomical variations of the portal venous system and their frequency.

METHODS:

A systematic review of primary studies was performed in the databasesPubMed, SciELO, BIREME, LILACS, Embase, ScienceDirect, andScopus. Databases were searched for the following key terms:Anatomy, Portal vein, Mesenteric vein, Formation, Variation,Variant anatomic, Splenomesenteric vein, Splenic veintributaries, and Confluence.

RESULTS:

We identified 12 variants of the portal venous bed, representing differentunions of the splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, and inferiormesenteric vein. Thomson classification of the end of 19th century refers tothe three most frequent variants, with type I as predominant (M=47%),followed by type III (M=27.8%) and type II (M=18.6%).

CONCLUSION:

Thomson classification of variants is the most well-known, accounting forover 90% of portal venous variant found in clinical practice, inasmuch asthe sum of the three junctions are found in over 93% of the patients. Eventhough rarer and accounting for less than 7% of variants, the other ninereported variations will occasionally be found during many abdominaloperations.

HEADINGS: Anatomy, Portal System, Portal Vein, Mesenteric Veins, Splenic Vein

RESUMO - RACIONAL:

O conhecimento do sistema porta e de suas variações anatômicas contribui paraprevenir acidentes cirúrgicos. Usualmente, a veia porta é formada pelaconfluência das veias mesentérica superior e esplênica, junto com suasprincipais tributárias: as veias mesentérica inferior, gástrica esquerda epancreaticoduodenal. Entretanto, variações anatômicas são frequentes.

OBJETIVO:

Este artigo apresenta uma revisão da literatura em relação às variaçõesanatômicas previamente descritas do sistema venoso porta e suafrequência.

MÉTODOS:

Foi realizada revisão sistemática de estudos primários nas bases de dadosPubMed, Scielo, BIREME, LILACS, Embase, Science Direct e Scopus. As bases dedados foram pesquisadas pelas seguintes palavras-chave: Anatomia, Veiaporta, Veia mesentérica, Formação, Variação, Variante anatômica, Veiaesplenomesentérica, Veia esplênica, tributárias e Confluência.

RESULTADOS:

Foram identificadas doze variantes do sistema venoso portal, representandodiferentes formações da veia esplênica, veia mesentérica superior e veiamesentérica inferior. A classificação de Thomson, do final do século XIX,refere três variantes mais frequentes, com predomínio do tipo I (M = 47%),seguido do tipo III (M = 27,8%) e do tipo II (M = 18,6%).

CONCLUSÃO:

A classificação de variantes de Thomson é a mais conhecida e responde pormais de 90% da variante venosa portal encontrada na prática clínica, namedida em que a soma das três junções é encontrada em mais de 93% dospacientes. Embora mais raras e representando menos de 7% das variantes, asoutras nove variações relatadas ocasionalmente serão encontradas durantemuitas cirurgias abdominais.

DESCRITORES: Anatomia, Sistema Porta, Veia Porta, Veias Mesentéricas

INTRODUCTION

The abdominal portal vein (PV) starts at the level of the second lumbar vertebra,anterior to the inferior vena cava and posterior to the pancreatic neck. It iscomposed of the hepatic pedicle, posterior to the hepatic artery and to the commonbile duct. The PV is formed by the convergence of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) andsplenic vein (SV), measures about 6.5 cm in length and 0.8 cm in diameter onaverage6,9,11. Its main tributaries are the left gastric vein, which ends at its leftborder; the pancreaticoduodenal vein, superoposteriorly close to the head of thepancreas9,11; and the veins proceeding from the small and large intestines (SMV andinferior mesenteric vein [IMV]). Other tributaries of the hepatic PV are the cysticveins, proceeding from the gallbladder; pancreatic veins; and right and leftgastroepiploic vessels, besides the short gastric veins through the splenic andright gastric veins. The IMV receives blood from the upper part of the rectum,sigmoid, and descending colon6,9,11,14. IMV is predominantly ventral and to the left of the superior mesentericartery, at the level of the third portion of the duodenum together with theduodenojejunal flexure. The SV is formed by 5-15 venules, originated at the red pulpof the splenic parenchyma, which join together close to the tail of the pancreas.Then, the SV receives as tributaries the short gastric veins in variable number;pancreaticoduodenal veins, also variable in number; and posterior gastric veins,including, eventually, the left gastric vein as well as the IMV. It must beemphasized that the splenogastric vessels are independent and are not among thetributaries of the SV, despite that communicating vessels could occur among them.The SV continues in a dorsal sulcus of the pancreas toward the direction of itshead, which can be visible through the lower border of the pancreas. The bloodsupply of the SV comes from the spleen, larger curvature of the stomach, pancreas,left half of the colon, upper rectum, and retroperitoneum6.

The SMV is formed by tributaries of the small intestine, right colon, head of thepancreas, and part of the stomach - through the right gastroepiploic vein. Itsposition is predominantly ventral and is a short vein that is formed from multipletributaries as they cross the third portion of the duodenum to the right of theduodenojejunal junction, close to the uncinate process11.

This presentation of the abdominal portal system is the most commonly found; however,there are variations which are the reason of the study among the anatomists for morethan a century ago. The first work relating variations of the PV tributaries waspublished by Thomson et al., which distributed them into three types25:

  • Type I - IMV as tributary of the SV

  • Type II - trifurcation in the PV, formed by the union of the SMV, IMV,and SV

  • Type III - IMV as tributary of the SMV

Despite that there are many anatomical works on the PV, its variations still continueto be described and, sometimes, they are unprecedented. Benninger et al. suggestedanother tributary of the PV, i.e., the splenomesenteric vein3. Recently, it was also described as modification to Thomsonclassification14, with variations of the left gastric vein as direct tributary of the PV orthe SV.

The objective of this study was to review the literature related to anatomicalvariations of the PV system and their frequency, accentuating the morphologicalknowledge and its surgical applicability, which may aid to prevent surgical adverseevents.

METHODS

Systematic review of primary studies was performed with the elaboration based on theChecklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews andMeta-Analyses (PRISMA)18 in the databases such as PubMed.gov, SciELO, BIREME, LILACS, Embase,ScienceDirect, and Scopus. In the search strategy, the unitermsused were as follows: Anatomy, Portal vein, Mesenteric vein,Formation, Variation, Variant anatomic, Splenomesenteric vein, Splenic veintributaries, and Confluence. The research included MeSH/DeCS/Emtree and Allfiels,excluding animals, in vitro studies, studies published in congressannals, secondary studies, and articles with inexplicit method. The includedarticles were only on humans with studies in cadavers, imaging examination, reports,and case series. Complete articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese were studiedwithout restriction from the institution of origin nor year of publication (Figure 1).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1 -

Flow diagram of literature selected articles related to abdominalportal vein system.

Only 61 articles were found for reading in their entirety, as well as the tile of thearticles of their respective bibliographical references. After reading all texts, 19were selected for this review, 18 with studies discussing (n=20) and 1 studyreporting a case not described yet in the literature with a total of 2418 cases in11 countries. Only one work investigated the PV during the operative act (Table 1). The other articles were not includedin this review because they do not discuss the frequency of the variations, do notpresent anatomical descriptions of the variations found, and do not presentstatistical data of measuring the frequency of the variations of the portalsystem.

Table 1 -

Thomson classification of abdominal portal vein system published inselected literature studies in number of cases (N) and(percentages).

Author, year (country)NMethod
  • Type I

  • N (%)

  • Type II

  • N (%)

  • Type III

  • N (%)

  • Others (types IV-XII)

  • N (%)

Thomson et al., 1890 (England)118Cadaver dissection71 (60.1)8 (6.7)39 (33)
Walcker et al., 1922 (the United States)150Cadaver dissection69 (46)33 (22)48 (32)
Gilfillan et al., 1950 (the United States)54Cadaver dissection30 (55.6)8 (14.8)16 (29.6)
Purcell et al., 1951 (the United States)100Cadaver dissection28 (28)3 (3)53 (53)16 (16)
Duques et al., 2000 (Brazil)56Cadaver dissection42 (75)2 (3.6)12 (21.4)
Cabrera et al., 2005 (Cuba)20Cadaver dissection15 (75)2 (10)3 (15)
Ibukuro et al., 1996 (Japan)43Angiographies19 (46)11 (25)13 (29)
Graf et al., 1997 (the United States)51Angiographies28 (55)9 (17)14 (27)
Misuta et al., 2004 (Japan)27Angiographies14 (51.8)4 (14.8)9 (33)
Kim et al., 2007 (South Korea)205Angiographies112 (53)26 (12)67 (31)
Zhang et al., 2007 (China)191Angiographies86 (45)34 (18)71 (37)
Gorantla et al., 2007 (India)01Cadaver dissection00000001
Sakaguchi et al., 2010 (Japan)87Angiographies63 (68.5)7 (7.6)17 (18.5)
Chaijaroonkhanarak et al., 2010 (Thailand)65Cadaver dissection38 (69.1)10 (15.38)17 (30.9)
Krumm et al., 2011 (Germany)916Angiographies344 (37.6)266 (28.8)176 (19.2)130 (14.2)
Benninger et al., 2013 (the United States +Lebanon)53Cadaver dissection38 (71.1)5 (9.43)10 (18.9)
Khamanarong et al., 2015 (Thailand)211Cadaver dissection117 (56.2)3 (1.4)91 (43.7)
Rault and Bahetee, 2015 (India)40Cadaver dissection12 (30)19 (47.5)9 (22.5)
Kaur et al., 2016 (India)30Cadaver dissection15 (50)3 (10)12 (40)
Total24181141 (47.1)453 (18.7)677 (27.9)147 (6.0)

Open in a separate window

There are 12 variations described relative to PV system through the union of the SV,SMV, and IMV (Figure 2), such that Thomson(1890) classification refers to the three most frequent, with predominance of type I(28-75%, M=47%), followed by type III (15-40%, M=27.8%) and type II (1.4-28.8%,M=18.6%). The three variations described by Thomson were the only ones described in16 out of 19 articles. The rest are rarer and make a total of 5.2% of the cases2,8,9,10,12,13,15,16,17,20,21,22,25,27.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2 -

Some anatomical variations of the abdominal portal system structure,according to Thomson (1890) classification 23. Type I: IMV as a tributary of the SV; type II: three veinsconstitute the portal vein, i.e. SMV, IMV, and SV; type III: IMV as atributary of the SMV; type IV: AccMV at the angle of portal confluence;type V: two SMVs and the IMV constitute the PV; type VI: IMV istributary of the SMV; type VII: AccMV is tributary of the PV togetherwith the IMV; type VIII: absence of IMV; type IX: AccMV as tributary ofthe PV; type X: two SMVs constitute the PV; type XI: LGV as tributary ofthe SMV; type XII: two IMVs, one a tributary of the SMV and the other atributary of the SV. PV: portal vein, SV: splenic vein, SMV: superiormesenteric vein, IMV: inferior mesenteric vein, AccMV: accessorymesenteric vein, LGV: left gastric vein.

Krumm et al. 16 presented six variants that were not previously described: type IV(n=70-2%), in which an accessory mesenteric vein (AccMV) enters at the angle ofportal confluence as in Thomson type II; type V (n=28-1.1%), similar to Thomsonvariant I with two equal SMVs and the introduction of the IMV into the PV; type VI(n=10-0.4%), similar to variant V, that is, the IMV enters in one of the SMV; typeVII (n=8-0.3%), similar to variant I, in which an AccMV enters into the PV at theIMV introduction site; type VIII (n=8-0.3%), in which the IMV is absent; type IX(n=6-0.2%), similar to Thomson type I, with an AccMV which discharges in the PVbetween the IMV and the confluence of the SMV and PV; and type X (n=2-0.08%), withtwo equal mesenteric trunks at the confluence of the PV. Gorantla et al. 10 reported type XI, in which the left gastric vein is introduced into the SMV(n=1-0.04%). Purcell et al. 20 described 16 cases of type XII, where there were 2 IMVs: a tributary of theSMV and another from SV (0.6%).

According to Krumm et al. 16, the variations can be distributed into three IMV introduction groups asfollows:

  • Group 1: IMV is tributary of SV (variants I, V, VII, and IX).

  • Group 2: IMV is tributary of SMV (variants III, VI, and XI).

  • Group 3: It does not fit into group 1 or 2 (variants II, IV, VIII, andX).

Variant XII is an exception because there are two IMVs, which can be included ingroups 1 and 2.

DISCUSSION

Thomson variants are the most well known in the surgical practice, inasmuch as thesum of the three junctions are found in over 90% of the patients. Less than 7% ofthe cases form the set of other nine variations. Even though rare, these variationsare possible to be found during operations such as gastroduodenopancreatectomy(Whipple surgery)1,7,24, colectomies28, venous bypasses due to portal hypertension (PH)5,19, hepatectonies19 and liver transplants26, as well as in diverse operations on the pancreas and extrahepatic biliarypathways.

In minimally invasive surgeries, and, most recently, in those performed with the aidof remotely guided robotic devices, perfect knowledge of the anatomical structuresand their variations became indispensable in abdominal operations, mainly those whohave visceral venous times, all pertaining to the portal system28. Variations in the vascular architecture are the common causes of operativeaccidents with consequent increasing in surgical time and of the postoperativehospitalization period27.

Portal hypertension is one of the diseases with multiple complications, includingcirrhosis, schistosomiasis, retroperitoneal and biliopancreatic tumors, as well asadjacent arterial aneurysms and right heart failure4,5,19. With the increase in pressure, the PV system is reorganized, with theincrease in caliber of the veins, such as PV (>13 mm), SMV, and SV (>10 mm),associated with splenomegaly5,19.

The anatomy of the portal system is also important in portal thrombosis (PT)26. The disease is classified into four types in accordance with the strickenvenous system and clinical manifestations as follows: type I: asymptomatic isolatedSV thrombosis; type II: asymptomatic intrahepatic PV thrombosis without PH; typeIII: asymptomatic diffused PT; and type IV: isolated or diffused symptomatic PT26. It occurs, in general, without known cause and is transitory; however, ithas been more widely studied after splenectomy. Usually, it is asymptomatic, andthere is no drug treatment yet that may prevent it or promote vascular rechanneling.Eventually, its clinical practice is associated with fever PT, abdominal pain,diarrhea, ileodynamic, ascites, and bleeding of esophageal varices23,26,29.

The knowledge of the abdominal portal system anatomy allows for the planning ofvenous bypasses to alleviate PH, mainly when associated with upper digestivehemorrhage. The bypasses include the right portocaval or with prosthesis,mesentericocaval, centralized and distal splenorenal, and left gastric caval.

The knowledge of portal anatomical variations helps also to understand thehepatofugal blood flow in the cases of PH1. More than 20 pathways have been described; for example, the reflux forinferior mesenteric collateral vessels that are connected through the hemorrhoidalplexus1.

CONCLUSION

Thomson classification of variants is the most well-known, accounting for over 90% ofPV variant found in clinical practice, inasmuch as the sum of the three junctionsare found in over 93% of the patients. Even though rarer and accounting for lessthan 7% of variants, the other nine reported variations will occasionally be foundduring many abdominal operations.

1How to cite this article: Prado Neto EV, Petroianu A. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig.2022:35:e1666. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020210002e1666

Financial source: none.

Central Message

4Although rare, the anatomical variations of portal venous system are possible tobe found during operations such as gastroduodenopancreatectomy (Whipplesurgery), colectomies, venous bypasses developed due to portal hypertension,hepatectomies and hepatic transplants, as well as in several surgeries on thepancreas and extrahepatic biliary pathways.

Perspectives

5A total of 12 anatomical variations of the portal vein have been published. Themost common is type I described by Thomson (1890), which consists of the portalvein constitution by the confluence of splenic and superior mesenteric veins,and having the inferior mesenteric and left gastric veins as tributaries.

REFERENCES

1. Addeo P, Nappo G, Felli E, Oncioiu C, Faitot F, Bachellier P. Management of the splenic vein during a pancreaticoduodenectomywith venous resection for malignancy. Updates Surg. 2016;68(3):241–246. doi:10.1007/s13304-016-0396-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Bacallao Cabrera I, Tamayo González E, Lorenzo Pérez E, Cuba Yordy O. Anatomic variants in liver irrigation and biliarytract. AMC. 2005;9(5):36–45. [Google Scholar]

3. Benninger B. Splenomesenteric vein: formally recognising a clinically relevantsection of the portal venous drainage system. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2013;72(1):63–66. doi:10.5603/fm.2013.0010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Bertoldi AS, Guetter CR, Coltro GA, Vosgerau LM, Brighenti LMV, Fauat NI, Kubrusly FB, Marques CAM, Kubrusly LF. Carvedilol as primary prophylaxis for gastric variceal bleedingin portal hypertension model in rats. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020;33(3):e1525. doi:10.1590/0102-672020200003e1525. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Carneiro C, Brito J, Bilreiro C, Barros M, Bahia C, Santiago I, Caseiro-Alves F. All about portal vein: a pictorial display to anatomy, variantsand physiopathology. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):38–38. doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0716-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Chaijaroonkhanarak W, Woraputtap*rn W, Amarttayakong P, Umka J, Brown K, Pannangrong W, Namking M. Length, diameter and variation of types of portal vein formationin Northeastern Thais. Srinagarind Med J. 2010;25(4):323–327. [Google Scholar]

7. Christians KK, Lal A, Pappas S, Quebbeman E, Evans DB. Portal vein resection. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(2):309–322. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2009.12.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Duques P, Araújo RS, Tolêdo ES, Rangel MF. Contribution to the study of anatomical variations in portalsystem formation. Medicina (Ribeirao Preto. Online) 2000;33(4):486–489. [Google Scholar]

9. Gilfillan RS, Hills HL. Anatomic study of the portal vein and its mainbranches. Arch Surg. 1950;61(3):449–461. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1950.01250020454005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Gorantla VR, Potu BK, Pulakunta T, Vollala VR, Addala PK, Nayak SR. Anomalous formation of the portal vein: a casereport. J Vasc Bras. 2007;6(4):399–401. doi:10.1590/S1677-54492007000400016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Graf O, Boland GW, Kaufman JA, Warshaw AL, Fernandez del Castillo C, Mueller PR. Anatomic variants of mesenteric veins: depiction with helical CTvenography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(5):1209–1213. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129413. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Ibukuro K, Tsukiyama T, Mori K, Inoue Y. Peripancreatic veins on thin-section (3 mm) helicalCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(4):1003–1008. doi:10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819401. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Kaur H, Singh M, Bajaj AS. A cadaveric study of morphology of portal vein with its clinicalimportance. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2016;9:336–340. doi:10.4103/0975-2870.182504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Khamanarong K, Woraputtap*rn W, Amarttayakong P, Ahooja A, Khuntikeo N. Classification of portal vein tributaries in Thai cadaversincluding a new type V. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016;38(6):735–739. doi:10.1007/s00276-015-1592-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Kim HJ, Ko YT, Lim JW, Lee DH. Radiologic anatomy of the superior mesenteric vein and branchingpatterns of the first jejunal trunk: evaluation using multi-detector row CTvenography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(1):67–75. doi:10.1007/s00276-006-0153-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Krumm P, Schraml C, Bretschneider C, Seeger A, Klumpp B, Kramer U, Claussen CD, Miller S. Depiction of variants of the portal confluence venous systemusing multidetector row CT: analysis of 916 cases. Rofo. 2011;183(12):1123–1129. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281745. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Misuta K, Shimada H, Miura Y, Kunihiro O, Kubota T, Endo I, Sekido H, Togo S. The role of splenomesenteric vein anastomosis after division ofthe splenic vein in pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(2):245–253. doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews andmeta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9, W64. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Petroianu A. Surgical treatment of portal hypertension in schistosomiasismansoni. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003;36(2):253–265. doi:10.1590/s0037-86822003000200010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Purcell HK, Connor JJ, Alexander WF, Scully NM. Observations on the major radicals of the extrahepatic portalsystems. AMA Arch Surg. 1951;62(5):670–677. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1951.01250030680007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Raut RS, Bahetee BH. Study of variations in the formation of portalvein. Sch J App Med Sci. 2015;3(3):1370–1375. [Google Scholar]

22. Sakaguchi T, Suzuki S, Morita Y, Oishi K, Suzuki A, f*ckumoto K, Inaba K, Kamiya K, Ota M, Setoguchi T, et al. Analysis of anatomic variants of mesenteric veins by3-dimensional portography using multidetector-row computedtomography. Am J Surg. 2010;200(1):15–22. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Silva-Neto WB, Quirese C, Moura EGH, Coelho FF, Herman P. Does the drop in portal pressure after esophagogastricdevascularization and splenectomy influence the variation of varicealcalibers and the rebleeding rates in schistosomiasis in latefollow-up? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021;34(2):e1581. doi:10.1590/0102-672020210002e1581. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Tewari M. Significance of pathological positive superior mesenteric/portalvenous invasion in pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016;15(6):572–578. doi:10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60156-x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Thomson A. Report of the Committee of Collective Investigation of theAnatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland for the Year1889-90. 1J Anat Physiol. 1890;25:89–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Tsamalaidze L, Stauffer JA, Brigham T, Asbun HJ. Postsplenectomy thrombosis of splenic, mesenteric, and portalvein (PST-SMPv): A single institutional series, comprehensive systematicreview of a literature and suggested classification. Am J Surg. 2018;216(6):1192–1204. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.073. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Walcker F. Contribution to knowledge of collaterals: the circulation of theblood in the portal system. Langenbeck’s Arch Klin Chir. 1922;120:819–858. [Google Scholar]

28. Ye K, Lin J, Sun Y, Wu Y, Xu J, He S. Variation and treatment of vessels in laparoscopic righthemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1583–1584. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5751-2. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Zhang XM, Zhong TL, Zhai ZH, Zeng NL. MR venography of the inferior mesentery vein. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64(1):147–151. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva : ABCD are provided here courtesy of Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva

ANATOMICAL VARIATIONS OF PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM: IMPORTANCE IN SURGICAL
CLINIC (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 5881

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.